Mobile Inquirer - Mobile News - Mobile Technology News - Smart Phone News - Tablet News - Reviews and Analysis

SOPA Now Dead Hail The Rise Of HR 1981

Written by Anthony Munns | Posted in Legal


HR 1981

Published on January 21, 2012 with 2 Comments

HR 1981 could be more detrimental to US citizen privacy that SOPA ever planned:

We take a look at why HR 1981 could be more of a privacy concern to US internet users that SOAP and put huge pressure on ISP’s to act as snoops on every internet user in the US, for the “protection of the children”. Is this really necessary or is this another Draconian Senator Lamar Smith bill he wants to pass to snoop more and more on US citizens?

Senator Lamar Smith HR 1981:

So we have had the SOPA Blackout with Wikipedia and many other staking stance at the bill being pushed through congress, and it now looks like it has been buried for a while, and this is more than likely the case rather than simply buried.

So we can all rest in our liberal, rational little worlds now the thought police have decided to come back another day, but is it all that clear on the horizon of rationalism?

Back up or die:

If you are going to conquer anything worthwhile you need back up plans, so was SOPA just a smoke screen, a SOPA screen if you will?

It appears that a Senator Lamar Smith who was largely responsible for the SOPA bill could well have another bill related to Child Pornography down his pants, this bill will track all your financial dealings online by forcing your ISP (internet service provider) to do the dirty work for the government.

The data collected will include your IP address, and there are rumours that your search history, credit card and other personal information will also be stored conveniently for 18 months, though this seems to be a little scaremongering above and beyond what is perhaps intended with this bill.

The bill is HR 1981:

Senator Lamar Smith HR 1981

Senator Lamar Smith HR 1981

How ironic that this bill should actually be called HR 1981 being so close to the famous Orwell novel 1984 book of a similar name which talks of “Big Brother” watching over its citizens with rather nasty intent.

This bill is thought to be more detrimental to civil liberties and freedoms on the internet than PIPA or SOPA ever tried to infringe.

Amending several areas of the “Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act of 2011.” which changes key areas in Chapter 18 Section 2703 which requires disclosure of customer information or records to include a requirement that your internet service provider provide the following data:

A commercial provider of an electronic communication service shall retain for a period of at least one year a log of the temporarily assigned network addresses the provider assigns to a subscriber to or customer of such service that enables the identification of the corresponding customer or subscriber information under subsection (c)(2) of this section.

Access to a record or information required to be retained under this subsection may not be compelled by any person or other entity that is not a governmental entity.

It has been noted that the third section below does attempt to look into the additional cost of implementing this bill:

The Attorney General shall make a study to determine the costs associated with compliance by providers with the requirement of paragraph (1). Such study shall include an assessment of all the types of costs, including for hardware, software, and personnel that are involved. Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Attorney General shall report to Congress the results of that study.

This changes the way that ISP’s are forced to collect Data. Where before they would have had to be given reason via a subpoena to collect personal data and then pass on this data as it was subsequently collected, now ISP’s would have to collect your personal data off the bat, just in case there is a need later, with a back up of 18 months of information on all clients.

This bill has currently gone through committee stage and is now heading for a full on vote.

Should your privacy be opened up like this for the greater safety of US kids or would this do absolutely nothing to protect children from those who are hell bent and so predisposed anyway?

I think not, this man is in fact a bit of a nutter.


About Anthony Munns

Anthony is the Editor in Chief and owner of Mobile Inquirer. Not quite a fully blown geek, I would actually prefer to see myself as the voice of the common man in this fascinating digital world. Stay tuned to our news on the usual channels dotted around the site! Thanks.

Browse Archived Articles by Anthony Munns




  • Guest

    This article is incorrect. PCIPA does *not* infringe on our civil liberties; in fact, the only change to current data retention that it makes is that ISPs must keep information they ALREADY keep for a year.

    Look at USC 2073 under title 18. ISPs are *currently* required to keep the following:
    - name
    - address
    - billing info
    - date of service / term of service

    On every one of their customers. The ONLY thing that HR 1981 changes is that this information be kept for a period of a year. The original legislation REQUIRES A WARRANT before gov’t officials request this information.

    Please, please, *please* do your damn research before reporting on things like this. The internet is riled up enough as it is without needing to spread misinformation on top of it.

    • http://www.mobileinquirer.com/ Mobile Inquirer

      Thank you for your opinon.

You may also like -

Virgin Media Wins Wi-Fi ContractVirgin Media win Wi-Fi contract for London underground: The Wi-Fi contract for the London Underground that has been the target for a number of ... SOPA Blackout Wikipedia Goes Black In Defiance At The SOPA BillSOPA Blackout - Wikipedia shuts down to highlight SOPA issues: You will more than likely have now heard about the US governments attempt to ...